David Wirthlin :: Conflation of Saf

Prior to history, Saf was considered marginal.  A number of factors are responsible for the emergence of people with a desire to be actively involved in being increasingly aware.

With this rise in benefaction & responsibility, it is very likely they played a creatively vital role in themselves.

The most revolutionary terms of complicity invite at least three ways Saf can ignore what follows.

It begins with a jump around the existence of the choice between freedom & involvement, in the construction of a third possibility only implied: Safs can develop their own pattern as they move in a self-chosen structure.

In short, the stage of choice, perhaps not as much as the bridge or the gap between.

Aside from the stage, the constructed nature of opportunity creates decisions.  One out of place Saf simply rests there, with no correlative. Then, between the next two, a fly-leaf.

As these build, the sense is the questionable connection of an immediately surrounded license & an invitation to engage with a tradition.

In the plan for the most curious & interesting chain reactions, fissions – transmutations – the role of Saf vs. Safs rests between these identities conflated.

In the beginning, the flexibility of the experience is a montage of the elements in each case chosen. Not explicitly mentioned is a running sub-current, the notion of a creative continuation of a project of bringing an empowering act that allows involvement.

If strategies at various times shift, without warning or explanation, to the variant of looking at the city on board, a ship without masts that goes through the canal, then, a spider silence.

Equally without notice, one single action is worth more than the shifts to keep Saf continually on edge & attentive. More than mere activity, these provide a texture Safs can move across, creating an act creatively vital to the conflating of the paradigm.


An entirely different approach is a playfulness that implicates the head of Safs.  Here, the usage of this mindset suggests Saf as well.

The past & future disorient Saf, not just in the forefront, but at the very least to a level of focus & concern with territory.

One small fragment, separated by a slippage, provides a view into the normally secreted world of Safs.

On a larger scale, Saf demands simultaneous construction & destruction of the subjective. Utilizing the sense to recuperate, some of these make it easier to identify, while some do not.

At one point, this is repeated close enough to the original, but without any explicating commentary.

This is circularity & it defies attempts to connect the statements along a logical Saf. Left to their own devices, Safs must participate in the meta-structuring of involvement, destroying the distance between each Saf.

As pre-cursor to silences, hanging threads & voices, numerous & often disembodied, all is focused in some way on the local subject. The effect of these voices is similar to the effect of one head still filled with sounds & voices.

The distance narrows to the point in which they are nearly indistinguishable from each other.  As these voices build amid the gaps, silences & cut scenes within Saf, location is impossible.

Just as the fragment is a voice, Safs collaborate in dream voices.


There is a continually direct, seemingly unmediated, experience in the inertial shifts of consciousness. Who knew about a cooperative continuation of indirect discourse?

The safety of partitions is noticeably absent here. This absence does more than disorient: it undermines the innate logic of the impossible.

This dense atmosphere is hardly relieved by division. At one point, observing some motionless sparks, a small, dark form cut Safs in half. Saf then must, in order to recuperate anything, provide the justification for this move.

If we, in large part, eschew the technical acrobatics of life, we acknowledge a vastness which creates a spectacle of itself. Once incurred, Safs must assume a tradition marked with exaggeration, now commonplace, & downplay the extraordinary.

The disappearance of Saf to invisible is done in such an even tone that when evaporated completely we don’t question the event.

Again, we invoke circularity at odds with sequence, which is then confirmed by an impression that disruption is the way of the other.

For Saf to recuperate, it must exist in all its totality, allowing Safs to apply their own disruptions.


The most subordinate Safs note the end of complexity. This had come to be seen as synonymous with identity shifts.

Indicative of the entire Saf issue, we can never be certain from whose consciousness they spring. It takes investment, patience, and imagination to achieve recuperation.

It is in this space that Safs challenged Saf to act in the space of artifice, the space which has the most liberties to reconstruct the obliterated binary of Saf & Safs.

As a means of shaping identity, Safs sought to incite an imagined empowerment.